Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the economic and political status of São Tomé and Príncipe within the Central African region as of early 2026. Africa’s smallest nation by population, with approximately 240,000 citizens, faces a critical juncture characterized by profound institutional crisis alongside preparations for pivotal presidential and legislative elections scheduled for September 2026 . Politically, the country is experiencing its most severe governance challenges since democratization in 1991, marked by the Constitutional Court, parliamentary fragmentation, disputed leadership changes, and tensions over presidential authority within the semi-presidential system . Economically, São Tomé and Príncipe confronts dire fiscal and balance-of-payments strains, with growth remaining subdued, inflation persistently high, and an International Monetary Fund program stalled since late 2022 . The paper examines the geopolitical dimension of the crisis, analyzing how the January 2026 visit of a Russian warship exposed institutional tensions and highlighted the country’s strategic location in the Gulf of Guinea . It concludes that the 2026 elections represent a decisive test for democratic resilience, requiring credible electoral processes and institutional restraint to prevent further erosion of the rule of law and restore the confidence of citizens and international partners alike .

1. Introduction

São Tomé and Príncipe occupies a distinctive position in Central Africa as a small island archipelago whose strategic location, democratic credentials, and persistent vulnerabilities combine to create a unique governance challenge. Situated approximately 250 kilometers off the coast of Gabon on the Equator, the two-island nation has historically been recognized for its competitive elections, open media environment, and peaceful political transitions since introducing multiparty politics in 1991 . This reputation earned it recognition as one of Africa’s more stable democracies, a status reinforced by regular alternations of power and respect for civil liberties.

Yet as early 2026 unfolds, this democratic heritage faces its most severe test. Political analysts increasingly describe a system under profound strain, with one observer warning that “democracy in São Tomé and Príncipe is fragile, vulnerable, and on the brink of a political coup” . The symptoms of crisis are unmistakable: parliamentary sessions interrupted, institutions functioning under tension, the Constitutional Court premises closed by police and Presidential Guard officers, and fundamental questions raised about the separation of powers and adherence to constitutional order .

This paper presents a deeply researched analysis of São Tomé and Príncipe’s current economic and political status, drawing upon official sources, local media reporting, international observations, and expert analysis from late 2025 and early 2026. The central finding is that the nation confronts a multidimensional crisis—political, institutional, economic, and geopolitical—whose resolution will determine whether it can reclaim its standing as a democratic exemplar or descend into prolonged instability.

2. Political Status: Institutional Crisis and Democratic Strain

The political landscape of São Tomé and Príncipe in early 2026 is defined by profound institutional tensions, parliamentary fragmentation, and fundamental questions about the proper limits of presidential power within the semi-presidential system.

2.1. Constitutional Framework and Institutional Design

São Tomé and Príncipe operates under a hybrid presidential and parliamentary model established by its constitution. The president is directly elected for a five-year term, limited to two terms, serving as commander-in-chief, director of foreign policy, approver of legislation, and impartial arbiter ensuring the smooth functioning of state institutions . This role is currently held by Carlos Vila Nova from the Acção Democrática Independente (ADI) party, who won 57 percent of the second round in the 2021 presidential election .

The 55-member National Assembly is elected to four-year terms and selects the prime minister, who serves as head of government, implements policy, and leads day-to-day functions . Following the 2022 parliamentary elections, the ADI secured 30 seats and selected Patrice Trovoada as prime minister. However, in January 2025, President Nova dismissed Trovoada for prolonged absences, appointing Américo dos Ramos, also from ADI, as the new prime minister . This dismissal marked the beginning of intensified institutional tensions.

2.2. The Deepening Parliamentary Crisis

The political crisis has evolved through multiple phases, culminating in early 2026 in a confrontation that directly engaged the Constitutional Court and raised fundamental questions about institutional authority.

Parliamentary Fragmentation: The traditional logic of governing majority versus opposition has been replaced by a “circumstantial aggregating majority, formed more by defensive necessity than by programmatic affinity” . This new majority comprises the MLSTP (Movimento de Libertação de São Tomé e Príncipe – Partido Social Democrata), dissident sectors of ADI (frequently designated ADI-2), and the BASTA party . Political analyst Leotér Viegas characterizes this alignment as “a majority of containment, not transformation,” born from “negative convergence: to contain the risk of institutional dysfunctionality associated with ADI’s internal conflict” .

Constitutional Court Intervention: In a dramatic development, a group of members of parliament convened a plenary session outside the authority of the National Assembly’s President, purporting to remove the Assembly President and dismiss judges from the Constitutional Court itself. The Constitutional Court responded within 24 hours, declaring the session unconstitutional and nullifying all decisions taken .

Political analyst Liberato Moniz commented: “This decision underscores the fragility of our political institutions. It sends a clear message that attempts to bypass constitutional procedures will not stand, but it also raises questions about how political actors will navigate the tensions ahead of the elections” .

Police封锁 of the Constitutional Court: The crisis escalated further when the Constitutional Court revealed that its premises had been closed by police officers and members of the Presidential Guard, following the court’s acceptance of an appeal linked to the removal of its judges . This unprecedented action sparked intense concern about the separation of powers and the functioning of key state institutions.

Moniz warned: “What is happening around the Constitutional Court is extremely worrying because it touches the heart of the rule of law and the balance of powers. If the independence of the Constitutional Court is perceived to be under threat, confidence in the entire democratic system can quickly begin to weaken” .

2.3. The Presidency as Structural Variable

A critical dimension of the current crisis involves the role of the presidency within São Tomé and Príncipe’s semi-presidential system. Political analysis suggests that “any serious reading of the new political configuration would be incomplete if it left out the role—explicit or latent—of the President of the Republic” .

The constitution establishes a semi-presidential model with parliamentary leanings: the President is supposed to be an arbiter, guarantor of state unity, and moderator of institutional functioning. Yet in practice, “the exercise of the position has frequently drifted toward active intervention in the political chessboard, often through the creation, informal tutelage, or protection of party projects” .

This pattern has historical precedents:

• Miguel Trovoada created the ADI during his presidency, decisively shaping the nascent party system of multipartyism

• Fradique de Menezes pursued a similar path with the MDFM

• Pinto da Costa attempted a personal political platform, though without lasting success

• Evaristo Carvalho was the notable exception, consistently avoiding this temptation and maintaining institutional restraint

Observers perceive that current dynamics point to a “re-edition of this pattern, albeit in less declared forms.” The widespread perception that the current government results from presidential initiative or cover, the dismissal of the President’s Chief of Staff to allegedly become a deputy amid parliamentary confrontation, and the absence of unequivocal political clarification “reinforce the reading that the Presidency has once again become an indirect—but determining—actor in the ongoing recomposition” .

The fundamental problem, analysts contend, “is not in the person of the President: it is in the functional deviation of the position.” When presidents intervene in party politics while exercising functions requiring distance, “the system enters a grey zone. The Prime Minister no longer knows whether he governs with full autonomy. Parliament begins to read political conflicts in light of implicit presidential alignments. And the arbitration institutions—Constitutional Court, National Electoral Commission—become preferred targets of indirect disputes” .

2.4. The 2026 Elections: A Decisive Test

Both presidential and legislative elections will be held in September 2026, marking a critical moment for the nation’s democratic trajectory . The Africa Center for Strategic Studies characterizes São Tomé and Príncipe as having “a history of competitive election,” with elections widely seen as free and fair, an independently operating National Electoral Commission (CEN), and independent media able to cover candidates without fear of reprisals .

However, the current institutional crisis casts a shadow over these preparations. The UN Special Representative for Central Africa, Abdou Abarry, emphasized in December 2025 that “reforms should precede presidential elections,” noting that while justice and security sector reforms are progressing with UN Peacebuilding Fund support, their completion before the polls is essential .

Key electoral issues include:

Candidates and Competition: While parties have yet to formally put forward candidates, it is expected that President Nova will seek a second term . The ADI and MLSTP-PSD have historically been the two major parties dominating elections, with multiple transitions of power between them and occasional “cohabitation” .

Electoral Integrity: The African Center for Strategic Studies identifies São Tomé and Príncipe as one of the countries where elections will test democratic resilience, noting that despite frequent government crises and party fragmentation, elections are expected to occur “in a competitive environment” and in tranquility .

The November 2022 Attack: The country’s tranquility was disrupted in November 2022 when four people were killed in an assault on a military barracks in an apparent coup attempt involving members of a disbanded South African/Angolan apartheid-era militia . While no evidence linked the attack to any political party, “a key issue for the 2026 elections will be to demonstrate that this violence was an isolated aberration rather than an ongoing feature of national politics” .

One political commentator warns: “The 2026 elections will not just be a date marked on the calendar. They will be a brutal test of the system’s credibility” .

2.5. Civic Space and Democratic Health

São Tomé and Príncipe has long been recognized for having “one of the most open environments for journalists and civil society leaders in Africa” . However, concerns are emerging about governance practices.

Analysts note “a worrying drift in the use of public media, increasingly mobilized as an instrument of governmental communication, with systematic absence of counterpoint and recourse to commissioned narratives intended to mold public opinion, rather than inform it” . Structural problems persist without convincing clarification: “energy crisis, weaknesses in water supply, budgetary credibility, and opacity in sensitive policies. The result is the perception of an executive in permanent crisis management, communicating more to protect itself than to account for its actions” .

One critical observer warns: “Silent corruption, shady business, land disputes, favoritism, hidden contracts, decisions made behind closed doors—all of this feeds public distrust that is corroding institutions from within. And the political class seems to forget an essential detail: a people that stops believing in the State stops believing in democracy” .

3. Economic Status: Fiscal Strain and Stalled Reforms

São Tomé and Príncipe’s economic situation in early 2026 is characterized by severe fiscal and balance-of-payments pressures, stalled international engagement, and limited growth prospects that constrain the government’s capacity to address social needs.

3.1. Macroeconomic Conditions

The Economist Intelligence Unit provides a stark assessment: “economic and financial conditions will remain dire. São Tomé is suffering from severe fiscal and balance-of-payments strains” . Growth projections remain subdued, averaging approximately 2.7 percent for 2024-2025, while inflation persists at very high levels, averaging 12 percent over the same period .

These macroeconomic pressures reflect deep structural vulnerabilities. As a small island state with limited natural resources, São Tomé and Príncipe depends heavily on foreign aid—approximately 80 percent of its budget now comes from external assistance . The economy, once the world’s leading cocoa producer at the start of the twentieth century, never recovered from the policy decisions of the post-independence era, when a centralized Marxist-Leninist regime “devastated the economy” .

3.2. IMF Program Stalemate

A critical dimension of the economic crisis involves the stalled engagement with the International Monetary Fund. The government has been attempting to negotiate a new program since the previous arrangement collapsed in December 2022 .

While a staff-level agreement was reached in March 2023, the IMF’s Executive Board has not approved a new program “owing to a lack of commitment by the government to implement and enforce strict fiscal and monetary tightening” . This stalemate has significant implications, as IMF approval would “catalyze vital financial assistance from donors” .

In the absence of IMF engagement, Portugal provided emergency support in December 2022 with a $16 million direct budgetary grant, but such ad hoc assistance cannot substitute for a sustained program of international support .

3.3. Structural Vulnerabilities

São Tomé and Príncipe’s economic challenges extend beyond immediate fiscal pressures to encompass fundamental structural constraints:

Limited Economic Base: The economy remains narrowly concentrated in agriculture (particularly cocoa), fisheries, and a small services sector. Diversification has proven elusive despite decades of development efforts.

Vulnerability to External Shocks: As a small island state, the country is highly exposed to terms-of-trade shocks, climate-related risks, and fluctuations in international aid flows.

Infrastructure Deficits: Persistent weaknesses in energy and water supply constrain economic activity and undermine investor confidence .

Debt Sustainability: Fiscal pressures and limited revenue generation capacity raise concerns about long-term debt sustainability, though specific debt-to-GDP ratios are not detailed in available sources.

4. Geopolitical Dimensions: Strategic Location and Great Power Interest

São Tomé and Príncipe’s location in the Gulf of Guinea—near valuable offshore hydrocarbon reserves, illicit trafficking routes from Latin America to Europe, and periodic pirate attacks—has attracted growing international attention with significant implications for domestic politics .

4.1. The Russian Factor

Russia has shown growing interest in forging closer ties with São Tomé and Príncipe in recent years, “part of a wider effort to expand Russia’s naval presence in the Gulf of Guinea” . This outreach culminated in the signing of a military cooperation agreement in 2024, covering training, arms supply, logistics, and joint exercises in exchange for Russian naval and air force visits. Russia has also proposed helping São Tomé and Príncipe monitor its 160,000-square-kilometer territorial waters using radars and drones .

The January 2026 visit of a Russian warship triggered a heated political and institutional debate. The main opposition party, ADI, accused President Nova and the government of permitting the vessel to dock and transfer cargo without informing or seeking approval from the National Assembly, arguing that this breached constitutional requirements for parliamentary authorization of foreign military forces in the country .

Political analyst Liberato Moniz notes that the controversy “exposes institutional tensions while also underscoring São Tomé and Príncipe’s strategic location in the Gulf of Guinea, an area that continues to attract growing international interest” .

4.2. Security Partnerships and Regional Cooperation

Despite its small population of approximately 240,000, São Tomé and Príncipe maintains 1,300-strong security forces and has developed ongoing security partnerships with neighboring African coastal countries, the European Union, Portugal, and the United States .

The country is a party to the Yaoundé Protocol, an effort by 25 West and Central African countries to improve cooperation in curbing illicit trafficking and piracy in the Gulf of Guinea. As part of Zone D (along with Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, and Gabon), it conducts joint patrols with neighboring countries .

These partnerships reflect both the country’s strategic importance and its dependence on external support for maritime security in its extensive territorial waters.

5. The Interplay Between Politics, Economy, and Geopolitics

São Tomé and Príncipe’s current challenges reveal complex interconnections between political instability, economic vulnerability, and geopolitical positioning.

5.1. Political Instability as Economic Constraint

The ongoing institutional crisis directly undermines economic prospects by deterring investment, complicating international engagement, and diverting attention from urgent development priorities. The stalled IMF program reflects, in part, donor concerns about governance capacity and policy commitment—concerns that the current political turmoil can only exacerbate.

Analysts note that “structural problems persist without convincing clarification: energy crisis, weaknesses in water supply, budgetary credibility, and opacity in sensitive policies” . These governance deficits, intensified by political fragmentation, perpetuate the cycle of economic underperformance.

5.2. Economic Pressures Fueling Political Discontent

Conversely, dire economic conditions contribute to political volatility by eroding public confidence in institutions and intensifying competition for scarce resources. When citizens perceive that political elites are “disputing power as if it were private property, not a public responsibility expressed in commitment to national development,” democratic legitimacy erodes .

The disconnect between political competition and developmental outcomes fuels cynicism: “Instead of solid governments, we have disposable governments, toppled at the whim of internal intrigues, inflamed egos, and disputes over the crumbs of power” .

5.3. Geopolitical Competition as Domestic Political Fault Line

The Russian warship incident illustrates how geopolitical dynamics intersect with domestic political competition. Opposition parties can leverage security partnerships to challenge executive authority, raising constitutional questions that further strain institutional relationships. Meanwhile, international partners watch these developments closely, assessing their implications for regional stability and their own strategic interests.

5.4. Elections as Potential Turning Point

The September 2026 elections thus carry extraordinary weight. They represent not merely a routine democratic exercise but a critical test of whether São Tomé and Príncipe can navigate its multiple crises and restore confidence in its political system.

Critical questions frame this test:

• “Will there be transparency? Will there be credible voter registration? Will there be clean counting? Will there be respect for the result, whoever wins? Or will we repeat the same cycle of accusations, manipulations, threats, and contestations that we already know by heart?”

One observer summarizes the stakes: “São Toméan democracy cannot withstand another collapse—either leaders change their attitude, or the country changes its leaders!”

6. Conclusion

São Tomé and Príncipe in early 2026 stands at a crossroads, its democratic credentials tested by the most severe institutional crisis since the introduction of multiparty politics in 1991. The nation that has long been recognized for competitive elections, independent media, and open civic space now confronts police封锁 of its Constitutional Court, parliamentary fragmentation, disputed leadership changes, and fundamental questions about the proper limits of presidential authority .

Economically, the country faces dire fiscal and balance-of-payments strains, with growth subdued, inflation persistently high, and an IMF program stalled since late 2022 . Development indicators lag, infrastructure deficits constrain activity, and approximately 80 percent of the budget depends on foreign assistance .

Geopolitically, São Tomé and Príncipe’s strategic location in the Gulf of Guinea has attracted growing great-power interest, with Russia signing a military cooperation agreement in 2024 and a January 2026 warship visit exposing institutional tensions over foreign policy decision-making .

The September 2026 presidential and legislative elections thus represent far more than a routine democratic exercise. They constitute a decisive test of whether the nation can reclaim its standing as one of Africa’s most resilient democracies or whether the “abyss” that some observers perceive will prove irreversible .

The path forward requires multiple simultaneous efforts: resolution of the immediate institutional crisis through respect for constitutional procedures and judicial independence; credible electoral processes that restore citizen confidence; renewed engagement with international financial institutions to address economic vulnerabilities; and mature management of geopolitical partnerships within constitutional frameworks.

As one commentator reflects: “Democracy is not just voting; democracy is responsibility, transparency, political maturity. And it is clearer than ever that São Tomé and Príncipe urgently needs to assume its real place with viable proof in the ranking of the best democracies of Lusophone Central Africa” .

The coming months will reveal whether the nation’s leaders can rise to this challenge or whether the “improvised democracy, sustained by elites who dispute power as if it were private property”  will yield to prolonged instability. For São Tomé and Príncipe, the stakes could hardly be higher.

References

1. Africa Center for Strategic Studies. (2026, January 12). São Tomé and Príncipe: Presidential & Legislative Elections, September 2026. africacenter.org

2. Téla Nón. (2026, February 8). Nova configuração política em São Tomé e Príncipe após a crise parlamentar. telanon.info

3. CHANNELAFRICA. (2026, February 11). Police shutdown of Constitutional Court deepens São Tomé and Príncipe crisis. channelafrica.co.za

4. CHANNELAFRICA. (2026, February 4). São Tomé and Príncipe court rules plenary session unconstitutional. channelafrica.co.za

5. News of Bahrain. (2026, February 11). Voters in Sao Tome and Principe choose new president. newsofbahrain.com

6. CHANNELAFRICA. (2026, January 9). Russian warship visit triggers political dispute in São Tomé and Príncipe. channelafrica.co.za

7. UN News. (2025, December 12). Reformas deveriam anteceder eleições presidenciais em São Tomé e Príncipe, diz enviado. news.un.org

8. Inforpress. (2026, January 19). Eleições em 11 países africanos em 2026 testam democracia no continente – estudo. inforpress.cv

9. Economist Intelligence Unit. (2026). São Tomé and Príncipe Insights. eiu.com

10. Téla Nón. (2025, November 23). A Democracia Santomense Está a Ser Empurrada Para o Abismo — E Fingir Que Está Tudo Bem É Parte Do Problema. telanon.info