Abstract

This paper examines Tanzania’s contemporary economic and political status within the East African Community, revealing a nation that has strategically positioned itself as the region’s anchor of stability and pragmatic integration. Economically, Tanzania presents a narrative of steady, inclusive growth with GDP projected to reach 6.3 percent in 2026, supported by remarkable price stability with inflation averaging 3.4 percent—comfortably within both national and regional targets. The government’s 2026/27 budget expansion to 61.9 trillion shillings signals confidence in macroeconomic fundamentals, while improved trade balances, private sector credit growth at 18.1 percent, and declining non-performing loans indicate a strengthening financial architecture. The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) stands as the centerpiece of a transformative infrastructure agenda, positioning Tanzania as Uganda’s strategic energy corridor and attracting over $5 billion in foreign investment. Politically, President Samia Suluhu Hassan’s administration navigates complex tensions between maintaining ruling party dominance and managing international scrutiny of democratic space. The High Court’s ruling allowing an opposition candidate to stand in October 2026 elections represents a tactical concession that may enhance electoral legitimacy while preserving CCM’s substantial majority. Tanzania’s deepening bilateral partnership with Uganda, encompassing pipelines, ports, railways, and security cooperation, signals a strategic shift toward “selective integration” that creates structural economic interdependence while broader EAC processes proceed at varying speeds. This paper argues that Tanzania’s status embodies a distinctive model of regional leadership through infrastructure-driven integration, macroeconomic credibility, and diplomatic pragmatism—offering a counterpoint to more assertive or fragile neighbors and positioning the country as the indispensable partner in East Africa’s collective future.

1. Introduction

Tanzania occupies a singular position in East Africa. As the region’s largest country by area and most populous after the inclusion of the Democratic Republic of Congo, it combines demographic weight with geographic centrality. Its 1,424-kilometer Indian Ocean coastline hosts the region’s busiest port complex. Its territory connects the landlocked countries of Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Zambia, and Malawi to global markets. Its history as a post-independence exemplar of African socialism under Julius Nyerere, followed by three decades of gradual liberalization, has produced a political culture that values stability, consensus, and gradual change over revolutionary transformation.

In 2026, this distinctive inheritance positions Tanzania as the anchor of East African integration. While neighbors grapple with insurgency, constitutional crisis, or assertive military posturing, Tanzania projects continuity and predictability. Its economy grows steadily if not spectacularly, with GDP expansion projected at 6.3 percent for 2026—respectable but below Rwanda’s 8.7 percent or South Sudan’s volatile 48.8 percent rebound . Its inflation remains among the region’s lowest at 3.4 percent . Its currency has strengthened against major counterparts. Its banking sector shows improving asset quality.

Yet beneath this surface of stability, significant dynamics are reshaping Tanzania’s regional role. The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), scheduled to begin operations in July 2026, represents the single largest infrastructure investment in East African history and cements Tanzania’s position as Uganda’s strategic partner . The deepening bilateral relationship with Kampala—encompassing oil and gas pipelines, railway connectivity, port access, and security coordination—signals a strategic shift toward “selective integration” that may reshape the East African Community’s internal dynamics . Domestically, the approach of October 2026 elections tests the balance between ruling party dominance and democratic legitimacy, with President Samia Suluhu Hassan navigating between the authoritarian legacy of her predecessor and the international expectations that accompanied her initial reformist reputation .

This paper investigates Tanzania’s multifaceted status through comprehensive analysis of its economic performance, political dynamics, and regional positioning. Section two examines macroeconomic fundamentals, fiscal strategy, financial sector development, and the transformative potential of energy infrastructure. Section three analyzes the political landscape, including election preparations, opposition space, and the evolution of governance under President Samia. Section four considers Tanzania’s regional strategy—the Uganda partnership, infrastructure diplomacy, and relations with other EAC partners including the new visa agreement with Somalia . Section five addresses structural challenges, including farmer-herder tensions, investment climate maturation, and the imperative of translating resource wealth into institutional development .

2. The Economic Dimension: Steady Growth, Strategic Infrastructure, and Fiscal Discipline

2.1 Macroeconomic Performance and Growth Trajectory

Tanzania’s economic performance in 2025-2026 reflects the benefits of policy continuity and prudent management. GDP growth is projected at 5.9 percent for 2025, accelerating to 6.3 percent in 2026 and averaging 6.9 percent over the medium term . These figures, presented by Finance Minister Ambassador Khamis Mussa Omar in the February 2026 budget guidelines, represent steady expansion from a stable base rather than volatile swings characteristic of resource-dependent neighbors.

The Central Bank of Tanzania offers complementary projections, with Governor Emmanuel Tutuba estimating mainland growth at 6 percent in the first quarter of 2026, while Zanzibar’s economy is projected to expand at a robust 7.2 percent . This Zanzibar outperformance reflects the islands’ distinctive economic structure, with tourism playing an outsized role and recent investments in hospitality infrastructure beginning to yield returns.

Sectoral analysis reveals balanced growth drivers. Agriculture, mining, and construction continue to provide primary momentum . Manufacturing shows gradual expansion, though from a modest base. Services, particularly trade, transport, and financial intermediation, contribute increasingly to value addition. This sectoral diversity distinguishes Tanzania from neighbors overly dependent on single commodities—a structural advantage that buffers the economy against sector-specific shocks.

2.2 Inflation Management and Price Stability

Tanzania’s inflation performance represents one of its most significant macroeconomic achievements. Headline inflation averaged 3.4 percent during July to November 2025, marginally above the 3.1 percent recorded in the same period of 2024 but comfortably within the national target range of 3.0–5.0 percent . The modest increase reflects specific supply-side factors—reduced domestic food availability following increased grain exports to neighboring countries—rather than generalized demand pressures.

This inflation rate positions Tanzania favorably against regional benchmarks. It remains below the East African Community ceiling of 8.0 percent and within the Southern African Development Community target range of 3.0–7.0 percent . For the fourth quarter of 2025, Zanzibar recorded even lower inflation at 3.4 percent .

The central bank projects inflation will remain within target throughout 2026, supported by prudent monetary policy and stable food supplies . This outlook assumes normal weather patterns and continued peace in neighboring countries that might otherwise generate refugee flows and supply disruptions.

2.3 External Sector Improvement

Tanzania’s external position showed marked improvement during the second half of 2025. The deficit in the balance of trade in goods, services, and income transfers declined to $433.1 million during July to November 2025, compared to $632.0 million in the corresponding period of 2024 —a reduction of approximately 31.5 percent.

This improvement reflects multiple favorable developments:

• Increased exports of goods, particularly non-traditional exports benefiting from improved market access and competitive exchange rates

• Strong tourism earnings as the sector continues its post-pandemic recovery

• Slower import growth, reflecting both moderating domestic demand and import substitution in certain product categories

The external sector strengthening contributed to currency appreciation, with the Tanzanian shilling gaining ground against major currencies during the reporting period —a notable achievement given the general trend of emerging market currency depreciation against a strong U.S. dollar.

2.4 Fiscal Policy and Budget Strategy

The government’s February 2026 budget guidelines for the 2026/27 fiscal year reveal ambitious expansion combined with fiscal discipline. Expenditure is projected at 61.9 trillion shillings, a 9.75 percent increase from the 56.4 trillion shillings allocated in the current year . This expansion forms part of a broader 204 trillion-shilling medium-term plan through 2029, aligned with the nation’s “Vision 2050” development goals .

The budget framework reflects careful calibration of competing priorities:

• Revenue mobilization remains the primary financing source, with the government intensifying domestic collection efforts

• Borrowing will remain prudent, aligned with the Medium-Term Debt Management Strategy

• Expenditure prioritizes flagship infrastructure projects, job creation (particularly for youth), food security, industrialization, and expanded access to social services including health, education, and water

The 2025/26 budget, presented in June 2025, allocated approximately 70 percent of expenditure to be financed through domestic revenue, with development expenditure accounting for 34.1 percent of the total . This emphasis on domestic resource mobilization reflects both philosophical commitment to self-reliance and pragmatic response to uncertainties in development partner support.

2.5 Financial Sector Development

Tanzania’s financial sector demonstrates robust growth and improving asset quality. Credit to the private sector expanded by 18.1 percent between January and November 2025, compared to 15.3 percent in the same period of 2024, reflecting accommodative monetary policy and increasing bank confidence in lending opportunities .

Non-performing loans declined to 3.1 percent in November 2025 from 3.6 percent in 2024 , indicating improved credit risk management and economic conditions that support borrower repayment capacity. This NPL ratio compares favorably with regional averages and suggests banking sector resilience.

Activity at the Dar es Salaam Stock Exchange reflects renewed investor confidence, with increased trading volumes and new listings signaling positive sentiment . The combination of credit expansion, asset quality improvement, and equity market activity points to a financial system capable of supporting continued economic expansion.

2.6 Public Debt Sustainability

Government debt stood at 109.01 trillion shillings as of November 2025, compared to 100.35 trillion in the same period of 2024—an increase of 8.6 percent . This growth primarily reflects disbursements of previously contracted loans to finance development projects, rather than new borrowing for recurrent expenditure.

A debt sustainability analysis conducted in October 2025 confirmed that public debt remains sustainable in the short, medium, and long term . This assessment provides crucial reassurance to international investors and development partners, distinguishing Tanzania from neighbors facing debt distress.

The government acknowledges potential risks arising from changes in development partners’ policies, including the postponement of EU budget support and suspension of Swedish education programme funding . In response, the government will intensify domestic revenue mobilization, rationalize expenditure, and prioritize essential obligations including salaries, public debt service, and social services .

2.7 The EACOP Transformation

The East African Crude Oil Pipeline stands as the centerpiece of Tanzania’s infrastructure-driven development strategy. Scheduled to begin operations in July 2026, the 1,443-kilometer pipeline will transport Ugandan crude oil from Hoima to the Tanzanian port of Tanga . The project represents the largest foreign direct investment in East African history, attracting over $5 billion in capital .

The economic implications extend far beyond transit fees. The pipeline has already catalyzed:

• Construction of new roads and fiber-optic networks across the central corridor

• Development of specialized technical skills among thousands of Tanzanian workers, from high-tech welding to environmental monitoring

• Integration of small and medium enterprises into the supply chain, ensuring wealth circulates within local economies

• Revitalization of Tanga Port, positioning it as a significant regional trade gateway

The success of EACOP has generated momentum for additional infrastructure cooperation. Discussions are advancing regarding a natural gas pipeline from Tanzania to Uganda to power industrialization, refined petroleum links to enhance regional fuel security, and synchronized railway connectivity to lower cross-border transport costs .

As one analysis noted, “EACOP is proving to be a template for future collaboration,” demonstrating “that when neighbours align their strategic interests, they can execute world-class infrastructure projects that defy skeptics” .

2.8 Strategic Minerals and LNG Potential

Beyond oil transit, Tanzania is positioning itself within global supply chains for critical minerals essential to the energy transition. Projects including the Mahenge Graphite Project and development activities around Tembo Nickel Corporation place the country within conversations extending well beyond regional markets . Graphite and nickel, crucial for electric vehicle batteries and renewable energy storage, represent significant export diversification opportunities.

Simultaneously, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) negotiations involving global players such as ExxonMobil reinforce Tanzania’s long-term energy aspirations . The potential to monetize substantial offshore gas reserves would transform the country’s fiscal position and create a new export industry. However, these negotiations remain complex, requiring alignment between government objectives, investor requirements, and community interests.

3. The Political Dimension: Managed Transition and Electoral Legitimacy

3.1 The Samia Era: From Reform to Consolidation

President Samia Suluhu Hassan’s tenure, which began following the death of John Magufuli in March 2021, initially generated significant international optimism. Her early moves—reversing some repressive policies, engaging with opposition figures, and signaling openness to investment—contrasted sharply with her predecessor’s authoritarian nationalism. International partners praised what appeared to be democratic opening.

By 2026, however, the narrative has shifted. Africa Confidential characterizes the current period as one where President Samia’s government has “taken a sharp authoritarian turn,” with a “concerted campaign of repression” that saw the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) win 99 percent of municipal council seats in 2025 following bans on most opposition candidates . This characterization may overstate both the continuity and the intentionality of repression, but it reflects genuine concerns among democracy observers.

The reality is more complex. President Samia operates within institutional and political constraints inherited from the Magufuli era—a security apparatus accustomed to impunity, a ruling party that rewards loyalty, and a legal framework that enables executive dominance. Her initial reformist impulses encountered resistance from these entrenched forces, producing an uneven governance record that combines continued economic openness with constrained political space.

3.2 The October 2026 Elections: Tactical Concession and Managed Competition

Tanzania’s presidential and parliamentary elections, scheduled for October 2026, will test whether the political system can accommodate meaningful competition while preserving CCM dominance. The High Court’s February 2026 ruling that Luhaga Mpina of the ACT Wazalendo party should be allowed to submit nomination forms—overturning the electoral commission’s suspension on a technicality—represents a significant judicial intervention .

Yet the competitive landscape remains heavily constrained. Tundu Lissu, the main opposition Chadema party leader, remains in prison facing treason charges . Chadema itself is banned from fielding candidates. ACT Wazalendo, while now permitted to stand a presidential candidate, won only four of 393 parliamentary seats in 2020, and even with former leader Zitto Kabwe seeking to return to parliament, analysts consider it “hard to see ACT taking even 10% in the presidential poll” .

The ruling party’s calculation appears tactical. With the main opposition effectively neutralized, allowing a minor party candidate to stand creates a semblance of competition that may reduce international criticism and address concerns about low turnout . As Africa Confidential notes, “Allowing a semblance of competitiveness in the polls should, CCM officials calculate, be enough to again avoid significant international criticism” .

This approach carries risks. If the election is perceived as fundamentally illegitimate—either domestically or internationally—it could undermine the very stability the ruling party seeks to preserve. The governance quality analysis cited earlier warns that “diplomatic signals influence credit committees, insurance premiums and sovereign risk assessments,” and that “investment policy cannot be separated from governance policy” .

3.3 National Unity Messaging

Amid electoral tensions, the government has emphasized national unity as a counterweight to political division. Prime Minister Mwigulu Nchemba’s February 2026 call for harmony between farmers and livestock keepers exemplifies this approach—warning against “division along occupational lines” that “could undermine peace and development” .

The prime minister’s message addressed specific tensions over land use between agricultural and pastoral communities, conflicts that have generated violence in multiple regions. But the framing carried broader political resonance: “professional differences should not foster division or mutual discrimination,” as “both farmers and herders are equal citizens entitled to work nationwide as long as they abide by the law” .

This emphasis on unity—on transcending sectoral identities in favor of shared citizenship—reflects a deep current in Tanzanian political culture dating to the Nyerere era. It also serves immediate political purposes, positioning the government as arbiter above factional interests and implicitly delegitimizing opposition that might exploit communal grievances.

3.4 Governance Quality and Investment Climate

The relationship between governance quality and investment attractiveness receives sophisticated treatment in recent analysis by Amne Suedi, Managing Director of Shikana Investment and Advisory. Writing in The Citizen, Suedi argues that while Tanzania has successfully generated investment momentum, “the central question is not whether Tanzania can generate investment momentum; it is whether Tanzania can institutionalise it” .

The distinction between momentum and maturity carries profound implications. Momentum is cyclical, dependent on favorable conditions and charismatic leadership. Maturity is structural, embedded in institutions that outlast particular governments. Suedi identifies specific governance requirements for attracting “long-term strategic investors who build domestic capacity, deepen local value addition and reinvest earnings”:

• Licensing frameworks must be clear and consistently applied

• Tax regimes must be transparent and rules-based rather than discretionary

• Dispute resolution mechanisms must function credibly and efficiently

• Public–private partnership agreements must be structured with legal precision

These are not “academic preferences; they are pricing determinants” .

The article notes diplomatic signals that warrant attention. The Acting US Ambassador’s description of aspects of Tanzania’s political climate as “concerning” and “alarming”—whether one agrees with the assessment—”enters global risk modelling frameworks immediately” . Such language influences credit committees, insurance premiums, and sovereign risk assessments, with tangible consequences for borrowing costs and investment flows.

4. Regional Positioning: Selective Integration and Infrastructure Diplomacy

4.1 The Uganda Partnership: A New Integration Model

Tanzania’s deepening partnership with Uganda represents the most significant development in East African regional relations since the EAC’s 2000 revival. The February 2026 talks between Presidents Samia and Museveni produced agreements spanning energy infrastructure, transport connectivity, trade facilitation, and security cooperation —a comprehensive package that analysts describe as signaling “a deliberate strategy to reposition Uganda as Tanzania’s closest and most strategically integrated partner within the East African Community” .

The partnership’s foundation is infrastructure. EACOP, scheduled for July 2026 operation, creates structural interdependence that extends well beyond the oil sector. As University of Iringa economist Samson Rutashobya observed: “When heads of state sit down to align oil pipelines, gas transport, ports and railways, they are not just discussing infrastructure. They are defining the future structure of their economies and who their most important partners will be” .

The cooperation extends to industrial specialization, with President Museveni noting that Tanzania will take the lead in locomotive manufacturing while Uganda focuses on textile production —a division of labor that anticipates deeper integration of production chains.

4.2 Beyond EACOP: Pipelines, Railways, and Ports

The success of EACOP has generated momentum for additional infrastructure cooperation spanning multiple sectors:

Natural Gas Pipeline: Discussions are advancing regarding a pipeline to transport Tanzanian natural gas to Uganda, supporting industrialization and providing cleaner energy for manufacturing .

Refined Petroleum Products Pipeline: A planned pipeline would transport refined petroleum products from Uganda’s planned refinery to the Tanzanian port of Tanga, creating a two-way energy corridor .

Railway Connectivity: Tanzania has committed to extending railway lines deeper into Uganda, facilitating smoother and more cost-effective cargo movement . This rail integration would reduce transport costs and improve competitiveness for Ugandan exports through Tanzanian ports.

Port Access: Discussions focused on improving access for Ugandan traders to the ports of Tanga and Dar es Salaam, streamlining procedures and reducing barriers .

This infrastructure web creates what analysts describe as “mutual dependence”—Tanzania benefits from sustained port usage, logistics services, employment, and fiscal revenues, while Uganda secures predictable and politically stable access to global markets .

4.3 The Logic of Selective Integration

The Tanzania-Uganda partnership reflects a broader strategic shift toward what analysts term “selective integration”—the recognition that while EAC integration proceeds at varying speeds across policy areas and member states, bilateral cooperation can move faster and deeper .

As Dr. Isack Safari of St Augustine University of Tanzania noted: “For many years, EAC integration has been broad but slow. What we are seeing now is Tanzania and Uganda choosing to move faster and deeper together” . Infrastructure creates permanence: “Once ports, pipelines and railways are aligned, cooperation becomes structural rather than optional” .

This approach does not abandon multilateral frameworks but recognizes their limitations. The EAC includes members at vastly different stages of development and stability—from Rwanda’s efficient authoritarianism to Somalia’s fragile federalism to South Sudan’s oil-dependent volatility. Waiting for all members to reach consensus on sensitive integration issues would indefinitely delay progress. Selective integration allows willing partners to advance while leaving space for others to join when ready.

4.4 Security Coordination and Political Alignment

The partnership extends beyond economics into security coordination and political alignment. Discussions addressed “strategies to promote peace and stability in the Great Lakes Region,” with “a shared plan to initiate dialogue processes aimed at resolving conflicts” .

This security dimension reflects the recognition that “instability in one country threatens transport corridors, pipelines and trade routes in the other” . As political scientist Dr. Paul Loisulie observed, “when countries become economically intertwined, political coordination becomes necessary. Supporting each other regionally and internationally becomes part of protecting shared investments and infrastructure” .

The political alignment was evident in President Samia’s congratulations to President Museveni and the NRM on their “landslide electoral victory,” attributed to “the party’s manifesto and ideological clarity” . Such mutual reinforcement strengthens both governments’ domestic positions while signaling international partners that the partnership is durable.

4.5 Relations with Other EAC Partners

Beyond the Uganda relationship, Tanzania maintains active engagement with other EAC members. The February 2026 visa facilitation agreement with Somalia represents a concrete step toward freer movement of people, establishing “simplified procedures for obtaining visas for certain categories of travellers, including diplomats, businesspeople, students and holders of official passports” .

Somalia’s Foreign Minister Ahmed Moalim Fiqi described the agreement as “an important step in our common desire to bring closer our peoples and to stimulate the economic and cultural exchanges,” noting that it aligns with “the vision of the federal government to promote regional integration and the diplomacy of the neighbourhood” .

With Rwanda, relations remain correct but cooler than the Uganda partnership, reflecting lingering tensions over past conflicts and divergent approaches to regional security. With Kenya, competition for regional trade dominance continues, though both countries maintain functional cooperation on trade facilitation and infrastructure.

Tanzania’s position as host of the EAC Secretariat in Arusha gives it institutional centrality that complements its bilateral relationships. The physical presence of Community institutions on Tanzanian soil reinforces the country’s image as the integration anchor.

5. Structural Challenges and the Path to Maturity

5.1 Farmer-Herder Conflicts and Land-Use Planning

Beneath the positive macroeconomic narrative, Tanzania grapples with persistent social tensions that threaten stability and development. Farmer-herder conflicts, arising from competition over land and water resources, have generated violence in multiple regions and require continuous government attention.

Prime Minister Nchemba’s February 2026 address in Handeni district acknowledged the challenge directly, noting that “given the growing population and livestock numbers, effective land-use planning is essential to prevent conflicts over limited resources” . He warned that “isolated misconduct should not be used to stigmatize entire communities” and that “the government will not tolerate lawlessness or violence stemming from land disputes” .

These conflicts reflect deeper structural issues: unclear land tenure, inadequate grazing reserves, climate variability affecting water availability, and population growth intensifying competition. Resolution requires not only security interventions but systematic land-use planning, investment in livestock infrastructure, and mechanisms for dispute resolution.

5.2 From Investment Momentum to Institutional Maturity

The investment analysis cited earlier frames Tanzania’s central challenge as the transition “from momentum to maturity”—converting episodic investment interest into durable institutional frameworks capable of sustaining large-scale capital over decades .

This transition requires attention to several dimensions:

Regulatory Predictability: Investors require confidence that rules will not change arbitrarily. Licensing frameworks must be consistently applied, tax regimes transparent and rules-based .

Fiscal Discipline: Resource revenues, if and when they materialize from LNG and mining, “amplify governance quality; they do not compensate for its absence” . Revenue management mechanisms must be transparent and insulated from political cycles.

Inter-Ministerial Coordination: Large projects require seamless coordination across government agencies, particularly where fiscal stabilisation clauses and long-term concession agreements are involved .

Dispute Resolution: Mechanisms must function credibly and efficiently, with risk allocation understood ex ante rather than contested ex post .

These institutional requirements are “less visible but more consequential” than investment promotion efforts . They constitute the difference between jurisdictions that attract capital and those that retain it over generations.

5.3 Balancing Sovereignty and Integration

Tanzania’s approach to regional integration has historically been cautious, prioritizing national sovereignty and domestic interests over rapid integration. The Uganda partnership represents an evolution rather than abandonment of this stance—a selective deepening with a trusted partner rather than wholesale commitment to multilateral processes.

This approach carries both advantages and risks. Advantages include maintaining policy flexibility, avoiding entanglement in neighbors’ conflicts, and preserving domestic political consensus. Risks include potential marginalization if other countries form alternative blocs, reduced influence in regional institutions, and missed opportunities from slower integration.

The challenge for Tanzania’s leadership is calibrating this balance as regional dynamics evolve. The EAC of 2026 differs dramatically from the community Tanzania joined in 2000. With new members including the DRC and Somalia, and with existing members pursuing divergent strategies, the community’s future shape remains uncertain. Tanzania’s ability to navigate this uncertainty while protecting its interests will determine its long-term regional position.

6. Conclusion: The Anchor’s Burden

Tanzania’s economic and political status in East Africa embodies a distinctive model of regional leadership—one based on steady performance, infrastructure-driven integration, and diplomatic pragmatism rather than assertive projection or ideological mobilization. Economically, the country demonstrates that sustainable growth need not be spectacular growth, that price stability builds confidence over time, and that infrastructure investment creates structural interdependence that outlasts political cycles.

The 2026/27 budget expansion to 61.9 trillion shillings reflects confidence in these fundamentals, while the EACOP project, scheduled for July operation, represents the tangible manifestation of Tanzania’s strategic centrality . Improved trade balances, credit growth at 18.1 percent, and declining non-performing loans indicate an economy gaining strength across multiple dimensions .

Politically, Tanzania navigates complex tensions between democratic legitimacy and ruling party dominance. The October 2026 elections will test whether managed competition can generate sufficient credibility to satisfy domestic and international audiences . The government’s emphasis on national unity—exemplified by Prime Minister Nchemba’s call for farmer-herder harmony—reflects awareness that stability requires continuous cultivation, not merely institutional inheritance .

Regionally, Tanzania has chosen a path of selective integration, deepening ties with Uganda through infrastructure, trade, and security cooperation while maintaining broader engagement with other EAC partners. This approach recognizes that multilateral progress proceeds at varying speeds and that willing partners need not wait for consensus . The visa agreement with Somalia demonstrates continued commitment to wider integration, but the Uganda partnership represents the strategic priority .

Several conclusions emerge for understanding Tanzania’s status:

First, economic credibility provides the foundation for regional influence. Tanzania’s stable growth, low inflation, and sustainable debt create confidence that neighbors and investors value. This credibility is hard-won and easily lost; maintaining it requires continued fiscal discipline and institutional development.

Second, infrastructure creates permanence that diplomatic agreements alone cannot achieve. The pipelines, railways, and ports linking Tanzania to Uganda represent commitments that will outlast any government. This structural integration is Tanzania’s most durable contribution to regional cohesion.

Third, governance quality and investment attractiveness are inseparable. As the investment analysis emphasizes, “investment policy cannot be separated from governance policy” . Regulatory predictability, transparent tax regimes, and credible dispute resolution are not luxuries but necessities for attracting the long-term capital Tanzania seeks.

Fourth, Tanzania’s anchor role carries burdens as well as benefits. Stability is not static; it requires continuous attention to emerging tensions, whether farmer-herder conflicts or political polarization. The perception of stability must be matched by the reality of institutional capacity to manage challenges.

For East Africa, Tanzania represents the indispensable partner—the country whose ports connect landlocked neighbors to global markets, whose territory hosts regional institutions, whose economy provides steady demand for regional goods, and whose political stability offers contrast to more volatile neighbors. As the EAC navigates crises from eastern Congo to Somalia’s constitutional tensions, Tanzania’s role as anchor becomes increasingly consequential.

The path forward requires sustaining the transition “from momentum to maturity” —embedding investment inflows in institutional frameworks that ensure benefits are retained and reinvested, not consumed or extracted. It requires managing the political tensions inherent in managed democracy, ensuring that electoral processes generate legitimacy even when outcomes are predictable. And it requires balancing selective integration with multilateral commitment, deepening partnerships with trusted neighbors while maintaining space for others to join when ready.

Tanzania has momentum. The test ahead is whether that momentum evolves into the institutional maturity that defines enduring regional leadership.

References

1. Daily News. (2026, February 2). Pro-growth budget plan unveiled. https://dailynews.co.tz/pro-growth-budget-plan-unveiled/

2. Africa Confidential. (2026, February 16). Samia’s tactical electoral concession. https://www.africa-confidential.com/index.aspx?pageid=7&articleid=15646

3. The Citizen. (2026, February 8). Samia-Museveni talks signal a new era of ‘selective integration’. https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/tanzania/news/national/samia-museveni-talks-signal-a-new-era-of-selective-integration–5352740

4. Uganda Broadcasting Corporation. (2026, February 6). Uganda, Tanzania Deepen Cooperation on Energy, Trade and Regional Peace. https://ubc.go.ug/2026/02/07/uganda-tanzania-deepen-cooperation-on-energy-trade-and-regional-peace/

5. KPMG. (2026). 2025/26 KPMG East Africa Budgets Analysis. https://kpmg.com/ke/en/insights/2025/06/2025_26_kpmg_east_africa_budgets_analysis.html

6. Xinhua. (2026, February 13). Tanzanian PM calls for harmony between farmers, livestock keepers. https://english.news.cn/20260213/91b6579c0ed140bab09074d5ab82eef0/c.html

7. allAfrica.com. (2026, February 8). Tanzania: We Welcome Eacop, Pipeline to Regional Prosperity. https://allafrica.com/stories/202602090385.html

8. The Citizen. (2026, February 18). From momentum to maturity: The real test of Tanzania’s investment ambitions. https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/tanzania/oped/from-momentum-to-maturity-the-real-test-of-tanzania-s-investment-ambitions-5365032

9. ACP. (2026, February 16). Somalia-Tanzania: signing of an agreement aiming to strengthen the free movement of persons. https://acp.cd/anglais/somalia-tanzania-signing-of-an-agreement-aiming-to-strengthen-the-free-movement-of-persons/

10. People’s Daily Online. (2026, January 8). Tanzania yatarajia ukuaji imara wa uchumi mwaka 2026. http://www.swahili.people.com.cn/n3/2026/0109/c416666-20412577.html