Abstract

This paper examines the economic and political status of the Central African Republic (CAR) in Central Africa as of early 2026, arguing that the country exemplifies the paradox of a resource-endowed yet structurally fragile state. Drawing on recent election results, regional economic summit outcomes, UN projections, and security analysis, the analysis demonstrates that CAR’s trajectory is characterized by political consolidation under President Faustin-Archange Touadéra alongside persistent economic vulnerabilities that deepen its dependence on regional mechanisms and international partners. The December 2025 elections, which granted Touadéra a third term with 77.9% of the vote, represent a political consolidation enabled by the controversial 2023 constitutional referendum but contested by opposition factions. Economically, CAR remains trapped in the broader CEMAC region’s stagnation—with Central Africa projected to grow at only 3.0% in 2026—while facing acute challenges including poverty affecting 71% of the population, foreign reserve declines exceeding $2.4 billion regionally, and limited fiscal space that constrains development spending. The paper further analyzes CAR’s evolving security partnership with Russia, transitioning from Wagner Group operations to the Africa Corps framework, and its implications for sovereignty and resource governance. It concludes that CAR’s status embodies the limitations facing Central Africa’s most fragile states: political survival achieved through external security partnerships and regional monetary integration, but structural transformation precluded by institutional weakness, revenue constraints, and persistent conflict legacies.

1. Introduction: The Central Paradox

The Central African Republic occupies a distinctive and deeply troubling position in the Central African landscape. A country of approximately 5.5 million people endowed with significant natural resources—including uranium, lithium, diamonds, gold, and timber—it nevertheless ranks among the world’s poorest and most fragile states . With 71% of the population living below the poverty line and GDP per capita (PPP) of just $1,112 in 2024—roughly 6% of the global average—CAR embodies the disconnect between resource wealth and human development that characterizes the region’s most extreme cases of state fragility .

As of February 2026, the Central African Republic stands at a critical juncture. The December 2025 elections have consolidated President Touadéra’s political authority for a third term, extending his tenure through 2033. A controversial 2023 constitutional revision eliminating term limits has enabled this consolidation, which proceeds amid ongoing security challenges, deepening Russian security cooperation, and persistent economic stagnation that regional mechanisms seem ill-equipped to address.

This paper assesses CAR’s contemporary status through interconnected analytical lenses. The political analysis examines the December 2025 electoral process, Touadéra’s consolidation of power, the opposition’s contested response, and the evolving security architecture centered on Russian partnership. The economic evaluation situates CAR within the broader CEMAC (Central African Economic and Monetary Community) framework, analyzing growth projections, fiscal constraints, monetary vulnerabilities, and the structural barriers to resource-led development. Together, these dimensions reveal a state managing political survival through external partnerships and regional integration while remaining unable to translate its natural endowment into broad-based development—a condition that defines the limits of state capacity in one of Africa’s most fragile settings.

2. The Political Landscape: Electoral Consolidation and Contested Legitimacy

2.1 The December 2025 Elections: Results and Validation

On December 28, 2025, Central African Republic voters went to the polls in a historic election—the first in the country’s history featuring simultaneous voting for presidential, legislative, regional, and municipal seats . Approximately 2.4 million citizens were registered to participate in what election observers characterized as “largely peaceful” proceedings .

The Constitutional Council’s final results, announced on January 19, 2026, confirmed President Faustin-Archange Touadéra’s victory with 77.9% of the vote—a modest increase from the provisional 76.15% reported earlier in the month . Former Prime Minister Anicet-Georges Dologuélé secured 13.1% (down from 14.66% provisionally), while another former prime minister, Henri-Marie Dondra, placed third with approximately 3% . The results granted Touadéra a seven-year term, extending his presidency, which began in 2016, through 2033 .

The electoral framework reflected significant prior constitutional changes. In 2023, a controversial referendum approved the elimination of presidential term limits, enabling Touadéra’s third-term candidacy . This constitutional revision had been opposed by the main opposition coalition, which subsequently declined to participate in the electoral process, citing what it characterized as an “unequal political environment” .

In his post-announcement address to supporters from the United Hearts Movement, Touadéra called for national unity to “build the country together for its development” . The African Union, through Commission Chairperson Mahmoud Ali Youssouf, promptly congratulated Touadéra, commending “progress under Touadéra’s leadership in the areas of security, post-conflict recovery and sustainable economic development” .

2.2 Opposition Response and Legitimacy Questions

The electoral validation was not without contestation. Dologuélé had filed an appeal with the Constitutional Council on January 6, 2026, alleging “widespread fraud and other irregularities” by the National Elections Authority . The appeal sought to annul the election and, days earlier, Dologuélé had controversially proclaimed himself the winner .

The Constitutional Council rejected the appeal, citing insufficient supporting documentation . Dologuélé’s party, the Union for Central African Renewal, issued a Facebook statement accepting the ruling in a “spirit of republican responsibility” while insisting that “our fight has never been one of disorder. It is about electoral truth, the sovereignty of the people and respect for democratic rules” . Dondra, the third-place candidate, had similarly called for vote cancellation, citing the electoral agency’s “incapacity” to organize the ballot .

These opposition responses, while ultimately accepting the Constitutional Council’s authority, reflect persistent concerns about electoral integrity that have characterized all three elections contested between Touadéra and Dologuélé (2016, 2020, and 2025), each “marred by suspicions of fraud” . Dologuélé’s retention of a parliamentary seat—he remains on course to win in the legislative election’s second round—suggests that opposition figures will continue to operate within institutional frameworks even while challenging presidential outcomes .

2.3 Political Consolidation and Institutional Control

Analysts characterize Touadéra’s trajectory as one of progressive consolidation of power within state institutions . The 2023 constitutional referendum’s success, despite opposition boycott, eliminated the primary institutional constraint on presidential tenure. The December 2025 electoral victory, achieved with an overwhelming majority despite a fragmented opposition field, extends this consolidation.

President Touadéra’s acknowledgment, when asked about third-term priorities, of “the country’s fragility” suggests an executive aware of governance limitations despite political victories . He articulated a agenda focused on combating “this fragility in terms of peace, security, social cohesion and the population’s basic needs” . This framing—recognizing fragility while claiming mandate to address it—captures the tension between political consolidation and effective governance that defines contemporary CAR.

2.4 The Russian Security Partnership: From Wagner to Africa Corps

No analysis of CAR’s political status can omit the role of Russian security cooperation, which has fundamentally shaped the regime’s survival capacity since 2018. The Central African Republic represents one of the first African theaters of Wagner Group operations, with Russian paramilitaries deployed at Touadéra’s request to underpin an army lacking funding and organization .

The relationship has been mutually beneficial: Moscow gains geopolitical influence and, critically, “lucrative contracts to mine gold and diamonds” that finance its operations . For Touadéra, the partnership has provided essential security backing that has enabled regime survival through civil war conditions and contested elections. The arrangement has earned the president the opposition epithet “President Wagner,” reflecting perceptions of dependence .

However, the partnership’s structure is evolving. Following Wagner leader Yevgeny Prigozhin’s 2023 death and subsequent Kremlin efforts to assert state control over private military operations, Moscow has demanded that Wagner be replaced with the Russian government-run Africa Corps . This transition, still underway as of early 2026, introduces new dynamics: direct state-to-state security cooperation rather than opaque paramilitary contracting. The implications for CAR include potentially more predictable security assistance but也可能 reduced flexibility in resource extraction arrangements that previously operated outside formal government channels. Tensions between Bangui and Moscow over this transition have been reported, suggesting the partnership’s future configuration remains contested .

2.5 The Peace Process: Mixed Outcomes

The 2019 peace accord, signed between the government and 14 armed groups, represented a landmark attempt to end conflict that has embroiled CAR since 2013, when mostly Muslim rebels seized power and forced President François Bozizé from office . The agreement’s approach—essentially incorporating warlords into government in return for militia disarmament—has produced mixed results .

While six of the 14 signatory groups later withdrew, the accord contributed to de-escalation from full-scale civil war . The African Union’s post-election congratulatory statement specifically commended “remarkable improvement in the implementation of the disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and repatriation process for armed groups, and the redeployment of state authority across an increasing portion of the country” .

Yet instability persists significantly. Conflict continues in the east, on borders with Sudan and South Sudan, and in the northwest . State authority, while extended, remains fragile in many areas, and armed group feuds persist despite the peace framework . The security situation thus reflects partial progress within continuing volatility—sufficient for electoral processes to proceed but inadequate for comprehensive stabilization.

3. The Economic Status: Stagnation Within Regional Fragility

3.1 Macroeconomic Context: Central African Growth Trajectories

To understand CAR’s economic status, one must first situate it within the Central African subregion’s broader performance. The United Nations’ World Economic Situation and Prospects 2026 report projects Central African growth at 3.0% for 2026, a modest acceleration from an estimated 2.8% in 2025 but trailing East Africa (5.8%), West Africa (4.4%), and North Africa (4.1%) . Only Southern Africa, at 2.0%, projects lower growth .

This subregional underperformance reflects structural challenges common to CEMAC member states: commodity price dependence, limited diversification, climate vulnerability, and tightening global financial conditions . For CAR specifically, these regional headwinds compound country-specific fragilities.

3.2 GDP Trajectories and Structural Constraints

GDP projections for CAR suggest modest but insufficient growth. Purchasing power parity (PPP) GDP is projected to reach $7.937 billion in 2026, increasing from $7.549 billion in 2025—a 5.1% annual increase in PPP terms . This trajectory represents improvement from the conflict-induced contraction of 2013, when GDP per capita PPP plummeted to $996.90 from $1,577.98 in 2012—a 37% collapse reflecting the civil war’s economic devastation .

Yet GDP per capita PPP of $1,112 in 2024, projected to reach approximately $1,149 by 2026, remains substantially below the 2012 peak . This stagnation reflects population growth outpacing economic expansion—a dynamic highlighted at the January 2026 CEMAC summit, where participants noted that regional growth “has not exceeded 2.1% over the past five years, which is below the population growth rate” .

The human development correlates are devastating. With 71% poverty, widespread unemployment, poor training, lack of basic services, impassable roads, and steadily rising living costs, ordinary Central Africans experience economic stagnation as existential precarity .

3.3 CEMAC Framework: Regional Discipline and National Constraints

The January 22-23, 2026, extraordinary CEMAC summit in Brazzaville, Republic of Congo, brought together the six member states—Cameroon, Chad, Central African Republic, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, and Congo—to address “sluggish growth, weakening commodity prices, climate-related shocks, and tighter global financial conditions” .

The summit’s outcomes directly affect CAR’s economic policy space. Leaders ordered “urgent fiscal and monetary measures” including immediate repatriation of export revenues, with extractive industries prioritized . They instructed governments to finalize negotiations with companies on transferring funds—estimated at $5-10 billion regionally—earmarked for environmental rehabilitation of oil-producing areas . These funds, currently held in foreign banks, would be moved to BEAC-managed accounts under IMF-backed reforms .

For CAR, a non-oil producer, these measures have indirect effects. The repatriation requirement primarily targets oil companies operating in Gulf of Guinea member states. However, the associated liquidity injection into the regional banking system could ease credit conditions and currency stability pressures affecting all CEMAC members . More significantly, the summit’s emphasis on “accelerating economic and financial programs with the IMF” and aligning national budgets with “commitments regarding debt sustainability and strengthening external balances” imposes fiscal discipline constraints on Bangui .

The summit’s final statement, however, notably “emphasized the necessity of continuing the macroeconomic stability strategy adopted since 2024, without announcing any new structural reforms” . This continuity emphasis, intended to “reassure markets and investors,” suggests recognition that reform capacity is exhausted and that consolidation, rather than innovation, defines the current policy phase .

3.4 Monetary Vulnerabilities: Reserve Declines and Exchange Pressures

The most alarming economic indicator emerging from the CEMAC summit concerned foreign reserves. Between March and November 2025, regional foreign exchange reserves declined by approximately 1,335.7 billion Central African francs ($2.4 billion)—”equivalent to one month of imports, raising concerns about the sustainability of the exchange system and increasing risk premiums” .

This reserve depletion threatens the CFA franc’s fixed exchange rate mechanism, which anchors monetary stability across CEMAC. The central bank’s analyses concluded that “2026 would be a test of the credibility of the member states, as investors await results that go beyond political statements” .

For CAR, these monetary pressures manifest in constrained fiscal space and imported inflation. As a net importer of manufactured goods and food, the country is vulnerable to exchange rate pressures transmitted through regional mechanisms. The reserve decline’s acceleration—despite relatively stable oil prices—suggests deeper structural issues in regional balance of payments that CAR, with minimal export diversification and persistent security-driven spending needs, is poorly positioned to address.

3.5 Debt Dynamics and Fiscal Space

Africa-wide debt dynamics provide context for CAR’s fiscal constraints. The UN report estimates Africa’s average public debt-to-GDP ratio will reach 63% in 2025, with interest payments absorbing nearly 15% of public revenue . Approximately 40% of African countries remain “in a situation of over-indebtedness or are at high risk of becoming so” .

CAR’s debt position, while less publicly documented than larger economies’, reflects these regional pressures. The country’s eligibility for concessional financing—critical given Ghanaian economist George Antwi-Boasiako’s observation that “many countries are locked into expensive loans from global markets, which only worsen debt pressures instead of supporting growth”—provides some insulation from commercial borrowing costs . However, limited domestic revenue mobilization constrains fiscal space: Antwi-Boasiako notes that “governments are finding it difficult to generate enough tax revenue to match rising expenditure, which puts constant pressure on public finances” .

The fiscal deficit trajectory is concerning regionally: after a surplus in 2023, projections indicate deficits “could exceed 3% of gross domestic product by 2026” . For CAR, meeting CEMAC convergence criteria—which require deficit limits—while financing security expenditures and basic service provision creates impossible tradeoffs that undermine both stability and development.

3.6 Resource Governance: Endowment Without Transformation

CAR’s natural resource endowment—including uranium, lithium (critical for battery technology), diamonds, gold, and timber—represents the country’s most obvious pathway to economic transformation . Yet this endowment has historically functioned as a conflict fuel rather than development catalyst, financing armed groups and external actors while generating minimal fiscal returns.

The Russian security-for-resources arrangement exemplifies this dynamic. Wagner Group operations secured “lucrative contracts to mine gold and diamonds” in exchange for security provision—an arrangement that generates revenue for Moscow-aligned entities while contributing little to transparent public finances or local development . The transition to Africa Corps governance may alter this calculus, but early indications suggest continued resource extraction in exchange for security support rather than fundamental reform of sector governance.

CEMAC’s repatriation requirements, if effectively enforced, could improve capture of extractive revenues. The requirement that “export revenues” and “environmental restoration funds” be held in BEAC-managed accounts represents an attempt to address what Antwi-Boasiako identifies as “limited control over natural resource revenues” as “a key factor behind the region’s economic fragility” . However, enforcement capacity in CAR’s weakly governed extractive zones remains questionable.

3.7 Climate Vulnerability and Agricultural Insecurity

The economic analysis must also acknowledge climate-related shocks as increasingly significant constraints. Antwi-Boasiako notes that “climate volatility has further weakened economic performance, particularly in agriculture, where unpredictable weather patterns have reduced productivity and increased vulnerability” .

For CAR, where agriculture employs the majority of the population and food security is precarious, climate volatility compounds conflict-induced displacement and infrastructure deficits. The combination of armed group activity limiting cultivation in fertile areas and unpredictable weather reducing yields creates a food insecurity trap that neither markets nor state capacity can adequately address.

4. The Regional Position: CAR Within Central African Dynamics

4.1 CEMAC Membership: Constraints and Benefits

CAR’s CEMAC membership provides both stability and constraint. The monetary union’s fixed exchange rate, guaranteed by French Treasury backing, offers currency stability that would be impossible for a standalone CAR franc. Access to BEAC refinancing and regional financial markets provides financing unavailable domestically.

Yet these benefits come at the cost of monetary policy autonomy. CAR cannot independently adjust exchange rates or interest rates in response to country-specific shocks. The reserve depletion crisis affecting the entire region—driven primarily by oil exporters’ fiscal imbalances—imposes costs on CAR despite its minimal contribution to the problem. As the central bank’s analysis warns, 2026 will “test the credibility of the member states”—a test CAR faces with limited policy tools to influence outcomes .

4.2 Security Regionalism and Bilateral Partnerships

While CEMAC coordinates economic policy, security regionalism operates through multiple frameworks. The African Union’s post-election engagement, through Commission Chairperson Youssouf’s congratulations and commitment to “support CAR in close collaboration with regional and international partners,” reflects continental engagement . The Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) provides additional regional security architecture, though its effectiveness has historically been limited.

Bilateral partnerships, however, dominate CAR’s security landscape. The Russian relationship, despite tensions over Wagner-to-Africa Corps transition, remains paramount. This bilateral focus distinguishes CAR from neighbors like Cameroon or Gabon, which maintain more diversified security partnerships including France, the United States, and regional frameworks.

4.3 Humanitarian Situation and International Aid Dependency

The economic analysis would be incomplete without acknowledging CAR’s extreme aid dependency. With 71% poverty and minimal domestic revenue mobilization, basic service provision relies heavily on international humanitarian and development assistance . The UN and NGO presence in Bangui and across the country constitutes a significant economic sector in itself, while simultaneously reflecting state capacity deficits.

This aid dependency creates vulnerabilities: declining official development assistance, which the UN report identifies as a headwind for African economies, directly affects CAR’s fiscal space and service delivery capacity . Donor fatigue, competing crises elsewhere, and tightening budgets in traditional donor countries all threaten the aid flows that keep basic systems functioning.

5. Challenges and Prospects: The Third Term Agenda

5.1 Security Consolidation vs. Perpetuated Fragility

President Touadéra’s third-term security agenda faces fundamental tensions. The peace process has achieved partial success, with state authority extended and disarmament progressing, yet instability persists in multiple regions . The Russian security partnership provides essential backing but at the cost of resource extraction arrangements that bypass transparent governance.

The challenge for Touadéra’s third term is whether security consolidation can progress toward self-sustaining state capacity rather than permanent dependence on external security providers. This requires building national defense forces capable of assuming responsibilities currently performed by Russian personnel—a long-term project facing significant resource and institutional constraints.

5.2 Economic Diversification Under Structural Constraints

The economic agenda articulated in Touadéra’s post-election comments—addressing “fragility in terms of peace, security, social cohesion and the population’s basic needs”—reflects recognition that economic transformation requires security foundations . Yet the structural constraints identified throughout this analysis—CEMAC-imposed fiscal discipline, reserve depletion limiting monetary space, weak revenue mobilization, climate vulnerability—suggest limited scope for ambitious diversification.

Resource-led development remains the most plausible pathway, but requires governance reforms that capture extractive revenues for public purposes rather than external security-for-resources arrangements. The Africa Corps transition, depending on its final terms, could either perpetuate this dynamic or create opportunities for more transparent contracting.

5.3 Political Consolidation and Governance Quality

The 2023 constitutional referendum and 2025 electoral victory have consolidated Touadéra’s position through at least 2033. This extended horizon provides potential for long-term planning if governance quality improves. However, political consolidation without institutional strengthening risks perpetuating the personalized governance patterns that have historically constrained development.

The opposition’s continued presence in parliament—Dologuélé’s anticipated legislative seat—provides some check on executive dominance . But the opposition coalition’s pre-election boycott and post-election acceptance under protest suggest fragile democratic consolidation.

5.4 External Partnerships: Russia, Region, and Beyond

CAR’s external partnership configuration will significantly shape its third-term trajectory. The Russia relationship, while providing essential security support, has narrowed CAR’s international partnership base and subjected it to geopolitical contestation. The transition to Africa Corps governance may either stabilize this relationship or introduce new tensions .

Regional partnerships through CEMAC and ECCAS provide essential frameworks but limited resources. The African Union’s supportive posture, reflected in Youssouf’s statement, offers continental legitimacy . Broader international engagement—with France, the United States, and multilateral institutions—remains constrained by security partnership choices and governance concerns.

The challenge for Touadéra’s third term is whether CAR can diversify partnerships sufficiently to reduce dependence on any single external actor while maintaining the security support necessary for regime survival.

6. Conclusion: The Fragile State’s Enduring Predicament

The Central African Republic in February 2026 presents a study in the limits of state capacity and the persistence of fragility. Politically, President Touadéra has consolidated power through constitutional change and electoral victory, securing a third term that extends his tenure through 2033. The Russian security partnership, transitioning from Wagner Group to Africa Corps governance, continues to provide essential backing while extracting resource concessions. The peace process has achieved partial success, with state authority extended and disarmament progressing, yet instability persists in multiple regions.

Economically, CAR remains trapped in structural constraints that regional mechanisms seem unable to resolve. With 71% poverty, GDP per capita below pre-conflict peaks, and growth lagging population increase, ordinary Central Africans experience the state’s fragility as material precarity. CEMAC membership provides monetary stability but at the cost of policy autonomy and exposure to region-wide reserve depletion. Resource endowments that could fund transformation instead finance external security arrangements and armed group activity.

The African Union’s post-election framing—commending “progress under Touadéra’s leadership in the areas of security, post-conflict recovery and sustainable economic development”—captures the glass-half-full perspective . The alternative framing—71% poverty, contested elections, Russian security dependence, persistent armed conflict, and economic stagnation—captures the glass-half-empty reality.

The truth lies somewhere between: CAR has achieved sufficient stability to conduct elections and extend state authority, yet remains far from the transformation its people deserve and its resources could support. President Touadéra’s acknowledgment of “the country’s fragility” suggests executive awareness of this gap . Whether his third term can narrow it—addressing fragility through institutional strengthening rather than perpetuating it through personalized governance and external dependence—will determine whether the Central African Republic remains trapped in its enduring predicament or finally begins to realize its long-deferred potential.

For Central Africa, CAR’s trajectory carries significance beyond its borders. A stable, developing CAR would contribute to regional integration and security. A persistently fragile CAR exports instability, hosts armed groups with regional reach, and imposes humanitarian costs on neighbors. The region’s collective future is thus entangled with the fate of its most fragile member—a reality that CEMAC’s monetary coordination and ECCAS’s security frameworks acknowledge but cannot easily resolve.

References

1. CGTN. (2026, January 23). Central African leaders order urgent reforms to shore up weakening economies.

2. Associated Press. (2026, January 18). Central African Republic confirms Touadéra’s election win despite fraud claims.

3. Africa Press Arabic. (2026, January 23). Central Africa Summit Confirms Economic Stability and Market.

4. Xinhua. (2026, January 19). Central African Republic incumbent President Touadera re-elected: Constitutional Council final results.

5. YCharts. (2025, October). Central African Republic GDP Outlook.

6. Xinhua. (2026, January 20). AU congratulates Touadera on re-election as president of Central African Republic.

7. Channel Africa. (2026, January 23). Central African leaders push for repatriation of offshore funds to stabilise economies.

8. United Nations Africa Renewal. (2026, January 8). African economies to grow in 2026, despite uncertain global context.

9. RTL Today. (2026, January 19). Central African Republic top court says Touadera won 78% of vote.

10. Trading Economics. (2025). Central African Republic GDP per capita PPP.